MASOUD BAHRAMIAI-NATIVE PRODUCT DEVELOPER
CASE / 013SALES / MULTI-CHANNEL

LEADCRMLeadCRM

A sales-lead management and follow-up system connected to Telegram and Bale, turning scattered messages into a traceable process.

ROLEPRODUCT · INTEGRATION · BACKEND
STATUSPRIVATE VIEW
VISIBILITYPUBLIC CASE / PRIVATE DEMO
OUTPUT06 DELIVERABLES
PUBLIC SYSTEM MAP / SANITIZEDCASE/013
PRIVACY BOUNDARY

To protect data and infrastructure, a functional diagram replaces a real screenshot.

ProblemLeads scattered across messengers
ChannelsTelegram and Bale
CoreRecording, status, and follow-up
PresentationPrivate demo with synthetic data
FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM MAP

How does the project work?

The four stages below show the product’s primary flow without exposing sensitive data or details.

  1. 01 / 04

    Lead intake

    A message or channel input becomes a traceable record.

  2. 02 / 04

    Assignment and status

    An owner, stage, and required information are recorded on the lead.

  3. 03 / 04

    Follow-up

    The next action moves from individual memory into a defined process.

  4. 04 / 04

    Pipeline review

    The overall status of entries becomes visible for operational decisions.

01
PROBLEM

A message is not a manageable lead until it is recorded

Sales conversations can begin in several channels and be lost when shifts or owners change. Chat history exists, but lead status, next action, and ownership are not clear within it.

LeadCRM was built to turn messenger input into a follow-up process.

02
CAPTURE

Multichannel intake with a shared model

Telegram and Bale integrations should handle channel differences in the integration layer and create one coherent record at the CRM level.

The goal is not to copy every messenger detail; the information needed for sales follow-up must be extracted and recorded in the right place.

03
PIPELINE

Status, owner, and next action

For each lead, it should be clear what stage it is in, who is following it, and what comes next. Those three elements turn a scattered conversation into manageable work.

Pipeline stages should fit the team’s real process and avoid the complexity of unused general-purpose CRMs.

04
FOLLOW-UP

Follow-up moves from individual memory into the system

Delayed or forgotten follow-up is a common failure point. Recording the next action and reviewing stalled leads reduces dependence on memory or unread messages.

Notification details and internal rules are not presented in the public version.

05
PRIVACY

Client data defines the publication boundary for the case study

No phone number, conversation text, or real sales data is shown. A product demo must use synthetic data and test channels.

Access architecture and connection credentials also remain outside the public documentation.

06
OUTCOME

An operational view from lead to next action

The system puts intake, status recording, and follow-up into one flow. Quantitative data about conversion rate or response time has not been confirmed for publication.

The next documentation stage can add anonymized indicators such as leads followed up and average first-response time.

DELIVERED SURFACE

What was built within the project scope.

This list is based on project outputs that can be stated publicly—not speculative features or unverified technology.

  1. 01Lead data model
  2. 02Telegram integration
  3. 03Bale integration
  4. 04Status and assignment
  5. 05Follow-up and next action
  6. 06Operational view
CAPABILITY SIGNAL
  • CRM PRODUCT
  • MESSAGING INTEGRATION
  • WORKFLOW DESIGN
  • BACKEND SYSTEM
NEXT SIGNAL

Do you have a similar challenge?

If your project sits between web, operations, content, and automation, we can first clarify the problem and the shortest path to build it.

Start a conversation on Telegram